Summary: it is possible to play Tetris and guarantee that you will score at least one line, no matter which pieces are given to you, i.e., even assuming they are chosen adversarially.
Schlagwort: Programmieren
Tetreassuring.
Uniband.
Some artists will benchmark your utf8 support: [...]
dustri.org: Horrible edge cases to consider when dealing with music
Only quoted.
Beware of bugs in the above code;
I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
Peta reduce.
1990 - A committee formed by Simon Peyton-Jones, Paul Hudak, Philip Wadler, Ashton Kutcher, and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals creates Haskell, a pure, non-strict, functional language. Haskell gets some resistance due to the complexity of using monads to control side effects. Wadler tries to appease critics by explaining that "a monad is a monoid in the category of endofunctors, what's the problem?"
One Div Zero: A Brief, Incomplete, and Mostly Wrong History of Programming Languages
Leanorris.
Hey! I heard that Lean thinks 1/0 = 0. Is that true?
Yes. So do Coq and Agda and many other theorem provers.
[...]
But doesn’t that lead to confusion?
It certainly seems to lead to confusion on Twitter. But it doesn’t lead to confusion when doing mathematics in a theorem prover. Mathematicians don’t divide by 0 and hence in practice they never notice the difference between real.div and mathematical division (for which 1/0 is undefined). Indeed, if a mathematician is asking what Lean thinks 1/0 is, one might ask the mathematician why they are even asking, because as we all know, dividing by 0 is not allowed in mathematics, and hence this cannot be relevant to their work.